Are Biometrics better or not

Biometrics is a technology that uses physical or behavioral characteristics to verify a person's identity. The debate over whether biometrics are better than traditional forms of identification has been ongoing. Proponents argue that biometrics offer higher security and accuracy compared to passwords or ID cards. For instance, a study by Jain, Ross, and Nandakumar (2016) found that biometric systems have lower error rates and are more resistant to fraud. This suggests that biometrics may be a more reliable method of identification.

On the other hand, critics of biometrics raise concerns about privacy and data security. According to Solove (2006), biometric data, once compromised, cannot be easily changed like a password. This raises questions about the long-term security of biometric information. Additionally, there are concerns about the potential misuse of biometric data for surveillance or tracking purposes.

Despite these concerns, the adoption of biometric technology continues to grow in various sectors such as banking, healthcare, and law enforcement. This indicates a growing acceptance of biometrics as a secure and convenient method of identification. However, it is essential to address the privacy and security challenges associated with biometrics to ensure its responsible and ethical use.

In conclusion, the debate over whether biometrics are better than traditional forms of identification is complex and multifaceted. While biometrics offer advantages in terms of security and accuracy, concerns about privacy and data security remain significant. Further research and development are needed to address these challenges and ensure the responsible implementation of biometric technology.

References:
Jain, A. K., Ross, A., & Nandakumar, K. (2016). Introduction to biometrics. Springer.
Solove, D. J. (2006). A taxonomy of privacy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 154(3), 477-560.